Thursday, 25 November 2010

When is a BBC booklist not a BBC booklist?

So. It's all over Facebook again:

Have you read more than 6 of these books? The BBC believes most people will have read only 6 of the 100 books listed here. Instructions: Copy this into your NOTES. Bold those books you've read in their entirety, italicize the ones you started but didn't finish or read an excerpt.

Only the BBC doesn't "believe" any such thing. And the list itself doesn't have anything to do with the BBC, come to that.

The BBC does do lists of books, and the nearest one to the memetic "BBC booklist" can be found here, which is a list of "the nation's best-loved" novels. Being best-loved, you can imagine that "most people" may well have read rather a lot of them, rather than “only 6”. But it's not the list being touted as the BBC booklist anyway, so it really doesn’t matter.

The list of books actually comes from a poll for World Book Day in 2007, published in The Guardian newspaper, and can be found here. As the accompanying news story explains, this was made up of 2,000 readers’ lists of ten books they “could not live without”. Once again, no mention of “only 6” (or the BBC, although it also covered the story). And, once again, the nature of the poll makes it reasonable that “most people” may well have read quite a few of them.

Interestingly, the version of the list that appears across Facebook (and elsewhere on the social media landscape) appears to have been copy-typed at some point, introducing errors – for example: the list at The Guardian correctly uses a lower case “d” before the apostrophe in Tess of the d’Urbervilles and gives author Louis de Bernières the grave accent that is rightly his.

So how did it get everywhere, and why’s it doing so again? Like a lot of these things, it’s much easier to disprove what it claims to be than to prove what it actually is. It’s really unclear when the meme began. although it was clearly kicking around in early 2009. And I’ve no idea what gave it its new lease of life...

Of course, the real reason for its existence is to help people feel good that they’ve read more of these than “most people”. It probably wouldn’t have had the same legs if the inventor had written: The BBC believes most people will have read only 62 of the 100 books listed here.

Thursday, 24 June 2010

YouTube’s vuvuzela button doesn’t always enhance the videos it graces…

vuvuzela-button

E minor and vuvuzelas do not like each other.

Although, if you get the key right (B♭), it’s not so bad…

vuvuzela-button2

Tuesday, 22 June 2010

Sax appeal

sax appeal

Just about everything is wrong with this photograph, taken during a gig by Bill Wyman’s Rhythm Kings in St-Paul-de-Vence on 6 June 2010 (Wyman’s nose is just poking in to the right of the shot), but I love it.

Wednesday, 9 June 2010

I don't take care of my person. Not like that, anyway.

I have just visited Amazon UK, only to find my "personalised" front page dominated by a "Most Wished For in Personal Care" section featuring items such as a Philips HP6517 Satinelle Ice Rechargeable Epilator and a ghd Precious Limited Edition Mark 4 Styler Straightener & Hair Dryer Gift Set (price slashed to £127.93).

What, in my buying history, could possibly make Amazon think I might be in the market for a Wahl Heat Resistant Pouch for Straighteners or Tongs ZX497? Is this some kind of weird post-modern attempt at irony, perhaps? If so, I'm not sure I like it. I'll put up with a lot in order to enjoy the convenience of online shopping, but irony may be pushing me a bit far.



I was actually looking for a URL for Harold McGee's magisterial On Food and Cooking, which is even better than Alan Davidson's Mediterranean Seafood, itself a book so magnificent as to inspire Auberon Waugh's not even slightly hyperbolic description: the best book written on this (or possibly any other) subject. It's a much more inspiring way of spending money than on "personal care", and a much better way of taking care of one's person, come to that.

And now I see McGee has a new book, available for pre-order. I expect that Keys to Good Cooking will be an essential read. I'll find out as soon as it's published, anyway. In October…

Monday, 7 June 2010

"Roman gladiator cemetery found in England". Well, sort of… Maybe…

CNN's headline says it all: Roman gladiator cemetery found in England.

Well, actually, it says a bit more than it probably should.

While the article itself contains plenty of may and might, the completely unequivocal nature of the headline leads the reader to think that the doubts are over the archaeological site's uniqueness, not the nature of those who are buried in it. Like this fellow, who is obviously a gladiator, no?

possible gladiator

Well, a trip to the York Archaeological Trust's own website's news page suggests that things may be rather more nuanced:

A Channel 4 documentary, which will be aired on 14 June, reignites the debate about the skeletons’ origins and follows the lead theory that the remains are those of Roman gladiators. But, as Kurt Hunter Mann, who is leading the research at York Archaeological Trust explains, there is evidence to support other theories, too…

So the real story is that a TV programme is going to push the claims of one (albeit the lead) possibility regarding the occupants of a Roman cemetery found quite a few years ago. Which isn't that much of a story is it?

An honest headline would read:

Roman cemetery found in England nearly a decade ago may possibly contain the remains of gladiators, as has been surmised for some time (as one of several credible options)

but that's, admittedly, a little less snappy than CNN's choice.

Tuesday, 11 May 2010

If you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all

Well, that's what I was told as a kid - although I suspect this astonishingly minimalist BBC News page has been set live by mistake and doesn't really express, fully and clearly, Auntie's view of the United Kingdom's current Prime Minister (and will probably be full of stuff very soon, er, I expect...).

gordonlegacy

Friday, 19 March 2010

It could be worse: it could be in print

Who’d be a sub-editor? To the Telegraph’s credit it fixed this minor typo about an impressive bit of physics pretty quickly – just not quickly enough to stop me grabbing this screenshot…

large-hardon